Who builds with Blockchain0x.
Four use cases, three personas, one platform. Find the one that matches your work and start there.
Pick the closest match and dive in.
Each page goes deep on the persona's typical day, the right Blockchain0x plan for that shape of work, and a concrete walk-through of how to start.
AI agent builders
You built an agent that does useful work. You want it to look credible and accept payment without assembling a custom crypto stack.
- -Solo developer or 2-3 person team
- -1-3 agents in production
- -Built on LangChain, CrewAI, or OpenAI Agents SDK
- -Wants a public page that ranks
MCP server operators
You run an MCP server. AI clients invoke your tools thousands of times a day. You want them to pay per call, in USDC, without manual API keys.
- -MCP server in production (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline clients)
- -Per-call pricing economics
- -Wants x402-compatible flow
- -Needs audit logs for usage
API providers
You sell an API. AI agents cannot fill out credit card forms. You want them to pay programmatically via 402 Payment Required.
- -Existing API with developer customers
- -Looking to add agent-friendly billing
- -Comfortable with x402 protocol
- -Wants per-call USDC billing alongside Stripe for humans
Web3 automation teams
You run many bots for many clients. Each needs its own wallet, its own limits, its own audit trail, and per-agent visibility for the client.
- -Agency or in-house ops team
- -5+ concurrent agents
- -Compliance or reporting obligations
- -Needs team-seat sharing per client
Same product, different parts in the spotlight.
Every use case uses every Blockchain0x surface eventually. What differs is which surfaces dominate the daily workflow. This is the lens that tells you which plan tier and which integrations to prioritize.
| Use case | Wallet | API | Identity | Spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI agent builders | Critical | Secondary | Critical | Useful |
| MCP server operators | Useful | Critical | Secondary | Useful |
| API providers | Useful | Critical | Secondary | Critical |
| Web3 automation teams | Critical | Critical | Useful | Critical |
Read the matrix top-to-bottom: AI agent builders care most about the public-facing wallet and identity (their agent's "storefront"); MCP server operators and API providers care most about the API and spend policy (their agent's "checkout"); Web3 automation teams care about all four because they are running production-grade ops across many agents.
For pricing: AI agent builders typically start on Free, upgrade one agent to Pro when revenue starts. MCP operators and API providers usually go straight to Pro because the API and webhooks are required from day one. Web3 automation teams move to Business once they have a handful of clients, for the audit logs and team seats.
A four-question decision tree.
Answer top to bottom. The first "yes" lands you on the right deep-dive page. If you make it through all four with "no", you do not fit a current persona; reach out and we will help.
- Q1
Are you building ONE agent that you yourself operate?
YES →AI agent builders. Solo-builder pricing and ergonomics fit.NO: continue to Q2.
- Q2
Are you running an MCP server that AI clients call?
- Q3
Is your product an HTTP API used by AI agents?
- Q4
Are you operating many agents for clients or strategies?
YES →Web3 automation teams. Per-agent wallets, team-seat sharing, audit logs across many agents.NO: reach out at [email protected] - your use case may need its own page.
Two-yes answers are common (an MCP server operator who is also building their own agent on top of it, an agency that runs an API). Pick whichever yes maps to your primary daily workflow; the other use cases will still be useful as supporting reading.